PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.21%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 224.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-52.94%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-52.94%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-50.15%
Negative net income growth while UPM.HE stands at 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-45.30%
Negative EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 8.70%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-45.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 8.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.86%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.86%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.57%
OCF growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 18.20%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
36.70%
FCF growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 6.76%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-22.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 12.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
2.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.22%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
113.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 55.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
29.03%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to UPM.HE's 27.82%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
88.76%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 45.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
123.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
184.15%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 3209.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-24.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is 41.76%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
42.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of UPM.HE's 48.95%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
70.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 34.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
45.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 22.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.87%
Similar asset growth to UPM.HE's 1.94%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
13.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.25%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-3.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.56%
SG&A growth of 19.56% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.