PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.25%
Positive revenue growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
44.98%
Positive gross profit growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
21.04%
Positive EBIT growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
21.04%
Positive operating income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
60.67%
Positive net income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
63.16%
Positive EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
63.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.53%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-8.68%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
25.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
182.79%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
247.97%
Positive OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
150.87%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
731.07%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 12.03% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
211.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
83.17%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
99.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 46.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 34.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
31.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 6.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.89%
AR growth well above UPM.HE's 57.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.56%
We show growth while UPM.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.44%
Asset growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.96%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.10%
Positive BV/share change while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
4.68%
Debt growth far above UPM.HE's 6.94%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.