PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.07%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.07%
Negative gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
88.57%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
88.57%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
575.00%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
500.00%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
500.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
21.87%
Share count expansion well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
21.87%
Diluted share count expanding well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.64%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
46.88%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 29.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 11.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-79.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 278.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-79.64%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-79.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 192.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
148.72%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
148.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
148.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.99%
Inventory growth well above VALMT.HE's 4.32%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.41%
Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-13.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.72%
We have some new debt while VALMT.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.