PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.01%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 4.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
3.01%
Gross profit growth similar to VALMT.HE's 2.93%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
1250.00%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1250.00%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
227.27%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
218.17%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
218.17%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
7.69%
Share count expansion well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.69%
Diluted share count expanding well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
294.44%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
167.65%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 29.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 11.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
573.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 278.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
573.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
573.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 192.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
123.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
123.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
123.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.89%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.