PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.65%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.65%
Negative gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-169.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-310.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-312.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-312.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.84%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.84%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-160.87%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
7.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 29.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 11.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
7.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
181.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 278.13%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
181.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
181.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to VALMT.HE's 192.67%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
40.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
40.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
40.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Inventory is declining while VALMT.HE stands at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.44%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.