PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.22%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 4.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
5.30%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 2.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
4125.00%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4125.00%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1033.33%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
972.21%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
972.21%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
7.56%
Share count expansion well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.56%
Diluted share count expanding well above VALMT.HE's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.29%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-372.22%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-9.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 29.63%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-9.55%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 11.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-9.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-62.18%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 278.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-62.18%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-62.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 192.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
249.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
249.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
249.37%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.33%
Inventory is declining while VALMT.HE stands at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.65%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.01%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.53%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.