PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.27%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
145.19%
Positive gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
543.28%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
543.28%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
380.33%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
411.36%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
411.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.09%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.09%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-83.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-14.10%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-15.06%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-9.93%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
572.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
173.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
8.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
125.94%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
50.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
282.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.37%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
19.97%
Positive short-term equity growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.60%
Our AR growth while VALMT.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VALMT.HE's 14.98%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.86%
Asset growth well under 50% of VALMT.HE's 18.57%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.20%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.72%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VALMT.HE's 565.67%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.05%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VALMT.HE's 55.22%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.