5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.67%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.75%
Negative EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.75%
Negative operating income growth while VALMT.HE is at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-51.01%
Negative net income growth while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.67%
Negative EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.14%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.14%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
65.77%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
266.79%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-23.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-27.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-30.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
30.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 285.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
540.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 285.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
103.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 285.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
133.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-31.58%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
150.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.03%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.88%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.03%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.55%
Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 5.42%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.18%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.61%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.