PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.11%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 16.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-61.24%
Negative gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is at 24.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-37.55%
Negative EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.55%
Negative operating income growth while VALMT.HE is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1.12%
Negative net income growth while VALMT.HE stands at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-1.12%
Negative EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.76%
Negative OCF growth while VALMT.HE is at 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.72%
Negative FCF growth while VALMT.HE is at 900.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-27.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-32.57%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-16.60%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
51.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 178.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
455.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 178.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
292.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 178.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
136.84%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 347.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
216.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 347.47%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-39.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is 347.47%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
6.18%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 104.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
0.42%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 104.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.72%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 104.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.12%
Firm’s AR is declining while VALMT.HE shows 26.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.02%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 0.70%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.02%
We expand SG&A while VALMT.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.