PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.04%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-8.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-16.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.79%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
401.80%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x VALMT.HE's 269.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
168.23%
FCF growth under 50% of VALMT.HE's 620.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-39.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 8.53%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-14.87%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 1424.54%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
200.18%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 1424.54%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
645.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 868.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
120.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 5.85% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
145.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 5.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
150.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 265.05%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.34%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
17.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while VALMT.HE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.28%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.38%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
We expand SG&A while VALMT.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.