PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.38%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
138.16%
Positive gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.40%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.40%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
38.46%
Net income growth comparable to VALMT.HE's 38.46%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
50.60%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VALMT.HE's 38.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
50.60%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VALMT.HE's 38.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-8.06%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.06%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.03%
Negative OCF growth while VALMT.HE is at 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.66%
Negative FCF growth while VALMT.HE is at 12.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-30.86%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-27.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 29.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
454.41%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 1980.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-18.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is at 1980.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
243.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 118.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
128.82%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 50.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
302.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 50.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
47.12%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 400.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
27.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 9.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.34%
Our AR growth while VALMT.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.60%
Inventory growth well above VALMT.HE's 4.67%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.64%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.68%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
5.88%
We have some new debt while VALMT.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.