5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.07%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
88.57%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
88.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
575.00%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
500.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
21.87%
Share change of 21.87% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
21.87%
Diluted share change of 21.87% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.64%
OCF growth of 163.64% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
46.88%
FCF growth of 46.88% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
4.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.69%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
4.37%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 6.68%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
4.37%
3Y revenue/share growth near Packaging & Containers median of 4.06%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
-79.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-79.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 12.58%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-79.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 12.31%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
148.72%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 59.46% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
148.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 36.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
148.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 45.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.99%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
3.41%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-13.05%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 2.24%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.72%
Debt growth of 1.72% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.