5.40 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-270.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.59%
Positive revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
179.92%
Gross profit growth of 179.92% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
42.16%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
42.16%
Positive operating income growth while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-20.26%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -8.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-21.30%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -2.78%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-21.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -2.83%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.35%
Share change of 1.35% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.35%
Diluted share change of 1.35% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-157.58%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is -54.58%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-329.13%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is -67.56%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-26.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 14.61%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-26.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 13.84%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-29.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 3.41%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-146.57%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -3.88%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-146.57%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -42.38%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-152.08%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
119.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 28.00% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
119.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-15.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 9.72%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.91%
Receivables growth far exceeding Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
6.35%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.42%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-0.00%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.74%
Debt growth far outpacing Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
0.85%
SG&A growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.