5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.44%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-1.81%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 4.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-25.98%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 12.99%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-25.98%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 9.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-32.26%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 10.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-28.53%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 9.78%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-28.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 9.78%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-5.16%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-5.16%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
581.58%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 12.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
429.66%
FCF growth of 429.66% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-19.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 12.16%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-19.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 14.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-24.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 4.28%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
538.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 538.22% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
538.22%
Positive 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would note a competitive advantage in mid-term cash generation.
439.86%
3Y OCF/share growth of 439.86% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
116.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 19.67% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
116.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 16.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
128.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.76%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 6.07%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
Receivables growth far exceeding Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
0.06%
Inventory growth of 0.06% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.31%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.94%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.98%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.12%
SG&A growth of 7.12% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.