5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.14%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-51.16%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
44.74%
EBIT growth of 44.74% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
44.74%
Positive operating income growth while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
32.80%
Net income growth of 32.80% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
32.80%
EPS growth of 32.80% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
32.80%
Diluted EPS growth of 32.80% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.66%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-14.78%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-40.75%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 15.70%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-28.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 3.27%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-14.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
13.15%
OCF/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median of 13.15%. Charlie Munger might attribute it to typical industry growth patterns.
273.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 273.87% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
59.82%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
130.92%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 58.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
110.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 42.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-23.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 29.85%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-2.19%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 4.82%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
28.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
19.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 10.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.58%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-0.99%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.76%
Asset growth of 3.76% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.90%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-10.00%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.10%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.