5.40 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-270.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.41%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.38%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
18.84%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
18.84%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
37.56%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 10.75%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
33.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 7.74%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.50%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
3.17%
Share change of 3.17% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.17%
Diluted share change of 3.17% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Packaging & Containers median is -0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
48.48%
OCF growth of 48.48% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
90.35%
FCF growth of 90.35% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-32.26%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 11.15%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-5.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.87%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-29.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.55%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
520.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 520.62% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-45.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
166.67%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 72.17% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
700.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 43.83%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
100.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 24.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 33.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
16.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.70%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.35%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
3.19%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
4.43%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.92%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.45%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.