5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.21%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
1.22%
Gross profit growth of 1.22% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-52.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is -4.71%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-52.94%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-50.15%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -7.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-45.30%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -7.76%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-45.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -7.76%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-8.86%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.57%
OCF growth of 104.57% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
36.70%
FCF growth of 36.70% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-22.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 19.43%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.50%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
30.22%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 8.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
113.59%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 33.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
29.03%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 19.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
88.76%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.86%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
123.28%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
184.15%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 44.86%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-24.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 4.66%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
42.76%
Equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit disciplined reinvestment or conservative payout ratios for outperformance.
70.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 28.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
45.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 19.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.05%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.87%
Asset growth of 1.87% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
13.09%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-3.84%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.56%
SG&A growth of 19.56% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.