5.40 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-270.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.77%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
4.85%
Positive gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-106.45%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-106.45%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-48.94%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -8.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-48.48%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -7.93%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-48.48%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -7.93%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.27%
OCF growth of 62.27% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
78.55%
FCF growth of 78.55% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-10.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 23.50%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-6.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 15.81%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 13.37%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
282.17%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 4.55% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
313.21%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
52.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 52.30% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-92.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Packaging & Containers median of 25.04%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-95.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 2.84%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-95.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -1.23%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
126.55%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 42.25% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
44.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
36.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 20.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.97%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.14%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.88%
Asset growth of 2.88% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.87%
BV/share growth of 1.87% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.33%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.82%
SG&A growth of 20.82% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.