PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.07%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
88.57%
EBIT growth of 88.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
88.57%
Operating income growth of 88.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
575.00%
Net income growth of 575.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
500.00%
EPS growth of 500.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 500.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
21.87%
Share change of 21.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
21.87%
Diluted share change of 21.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.64%
OCF growth of 163.64% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
46.88%
FCF growth of 46.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
4.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.45%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
4.37%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.15%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
4.37%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-79.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.84%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-79.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.02%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-79.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.67%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
148.72%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 58.48% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
148.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 31.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
148.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 28.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.99%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
3.41%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-13.05%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.19%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.72%
Debt growth of 1.72% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.