PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.76%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
127.85%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-4.11%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.11%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-9.81%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.50%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.92%
Share change of 1.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.92%
Diluted share change of 1.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-133.84%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-273.86%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-32.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.32%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-34.81%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.67%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-4.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.08%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-209.24%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-165.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-159.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
120.17%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 43.25% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-12.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.05%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
250.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.47%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
38.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
42.10%
AR growth of 42.10% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.75%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.51%
Asset growth of 0.51% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-5.98%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.85%
Debt growth of 5.85% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.18%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.