5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.38%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
138.16%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
17.40%
EBIT growth of 17.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
17.40%
Operating income growth of 17.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
38.46%
Net income growth of 38.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
50.60%
EPS growth of 50.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
50.60%
Diluted EPS growth of 50.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-8.06%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-8.06%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.03%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-82.66%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-30.86%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 27.04%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-27.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.84%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.33%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
454.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 454.41% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-18.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
243.74%
3Y OCF/share growth of 243.74% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
128.82%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 55.11% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
302.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 25.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
47.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 21.30%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
27.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 13.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.34%
AR growth of 8.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
8.60%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.29%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
6.68%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
5.88%
Debt growth of 5.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.58%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.