PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
120.47%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
26.84%
EBIT growth of 26.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
26.84%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
28.03%
Net income growth of 28.03% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
25.00%
EPS growth of 25.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.58%
Share change of 0.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.58%
Diluted share change of 0.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.54%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-74.46%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-27.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 29.62%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.43%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-15.16%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.41%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
497.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 497.93% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-23.94%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-15.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
143.23%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 76.31% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
650.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 30.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
66.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.86%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 26.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
10.56%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.92%
AR growth of 18.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
3.95%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
3.61%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-2.92%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.05%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
7.18%
Debt growth of 7.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.68%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.