PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.05%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.86%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.47%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.47%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.31%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-39.09%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-41.18%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-41.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
3.54%
Share change of 3.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.54%
Diluted share change of 3.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.66%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-54.73%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-25.54%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 42.82%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-7.94%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.05%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
20.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
240.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 240.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-68.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
247.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 247.30% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
134.89%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 55.75% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.96%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
66.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
36.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
233.14%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 233.14% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
81.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.82% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-3.07%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.73%
Inventory growth of 1.73% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.96%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.70%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.05%
Debt growth of 18.05% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.57%
SG&A growth of 9.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.