5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.21%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
1.22%
Gross profit growth of 1.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-52.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.72%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-52.94%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-50.15%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -10.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-45.30%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -8.89%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-45.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -8.91%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-8.86%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.57%
OCF growth of 104.57% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
36.70%
FCF growth of 36.70% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-22.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 31.80%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.50%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
30.22%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.03%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
113.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 113.59% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
29.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 29.03% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
88.76%
3Y OCF/share growth of 88.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
123.28%
Net income/share CAGR of 123.28% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
184.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 184.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-24.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
42.76%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.73% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
70.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
45.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.05%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.87%
Asset growth of 1.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
13.09%
BV/share growth of 13.09% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.84%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.56%
SG&A growth of 19.56% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.