5.40 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-270.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.21%
Revenue growth of 0.21% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
15.43%
Gross profit growth of 15.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
96.75%
EBIT growth of 96.75% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
96.75%
Operating income growth of 96.75% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
133.94%
Net income growth of 133.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
150.00%
EPS growth of 150.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 150.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-6.43%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.43%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.63%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-31.92%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-45.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-4.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
354.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 354.26% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
37.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 37.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
119.88%
3Y OCF/share growth of 119.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
600.00%
Net income/share CAGR of 600.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-0.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is -17.03%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
66.67%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
3.68%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
33.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 33.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
31.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 31.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.06%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.06% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
42.58%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 42.58% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.44%
AR growth of 2.44% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.19%
Inventory growth of 6.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.35%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.07%
BV/share growth of 3.07% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
4.18%
Debt growth of 4.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.87%
SG&A growth of 10.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.