PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.40 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-270.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.40%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.52%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-6.02%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 42.11%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-6.02%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 45.45%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-9.09%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 45.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-13.33%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 47.62%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-13.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 47.73%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
4.90%
Share change of 4.90% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
4.90%
Diluted share change of 4.90% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
2.90%
OCF growth of 2.90% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-9.50%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-36.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.15%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-12.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.28%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-2.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
377.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 377.72% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-25.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
8.92%
3Y OCF/share growth of 8.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
11.18%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.76% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
62.50%
Net income/share CAGR of 62.50% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
18.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 18.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
17.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.24% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
19.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
16.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 16.32% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.37%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.47%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.54%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.01%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.15%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.45%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.