PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.15%
Cost increase while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.19%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.57%
Operating expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.01%
Total costs growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
49.37%
Interest expense growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.78%
D&A growth while HUH1V.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-48.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.53%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 3.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-57.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.05%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-59.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.73%
Share count increase while HUH1V.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.