PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
17.76%
Cost increase while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-56.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-32.09%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.75%
Total costs growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.22%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
86.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 3.49%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
41.05%
EBITDA growth while HUH1V.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 17.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of HUH1V.HE's 84.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-93.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 11.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.91%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-70.67%
Net income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 37.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.83%
Net margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 95.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.81%
EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 37.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.81%
Diluted EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 37.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.89%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.89%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.