PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.60%
Revenue decline while HUH1V.HE shows 4.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.37%
Cost reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 7.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.22%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.95%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 3520.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.95%
Operating expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 48.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.50%
Total costs reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 10.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.43%
D&A growth less than half of HUH1V.HE's 55.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.83%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
769.05%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 238.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
161.90%
Tax expense growth while HUH1V.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.22%
Diluted share reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.