PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.85%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.31%
Gross profit decline while HUH1V.HE shows 10.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.96%
Margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 12.22% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.57%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-33.33%
Interest expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 11.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.13%
D&A reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 2.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.22%
EBITDA decline while HUH1V.HE shows 36.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.26%
EBITDA margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 11.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.49%
Operating income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 66.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.07%
Operating margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 68.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
155.00%
Other expenses growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-84.36%
Pre-tax income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 91.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 94.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.00%
Tax expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 131.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.26%
Net income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 75.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.31%
Net margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 77.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.43%
EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.43%
Diluted EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.28%
Share count change of 0.28% while HUH1V.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.28%
Diluted share change of 0.28% while HUH1V.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.