5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 3.35%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-35.41%
Gross profit decline while HUH1V.HE shows 8.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-38.71%
Margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 4.62% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.27%
Other expenses change of 63.27% while HUH1V.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-8.42%
Operating expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 28.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.73%
Total costs growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 4.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
175.00%
Interest expense growth while HUH1V.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-36.44%
EBITDA decline while HUH1V.HE shows 15.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.39%
Other expenses reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 111.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.15%
Pre-tax income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 57.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.99%
Pre-tax margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 52.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.70%
Tax expense reduction while HUH1V.HE shows 17.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-168.70%
Net income decline while HUH1V.HE shows 79.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.18%
Net margin decline while HUH1V.HE shows 73.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.65%
EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 77.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.65%
Diluted EPS decline while HUH1V.HE shows 77.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count reduction below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.