PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.92%
Similar revenue growth to METSB.HE's 1.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
2.09%
Similar cost growth to METSB.HE's 2.09%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.44%
Similar gross profit growth to METSB.HE's 1.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.73%
Similar other expenses growth to METSB.HE's 672.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
672.73%
Similar operating expenses growth to METSB.HE's 672.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
43.21%
Similar total costs growth to METSB.HE's 43.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
493.10%
Similar interest expense growth to METSB.HE's 493.10%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.57%
Similar D&A growth to METSB.HE's 3.57%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-71.64%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-446.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-94.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-94.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.02%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.54%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-23.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.