5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.15%
Cost increase while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.19%
Gross profit decline while STERV.HE shows 0.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.10%
Margin decline while STERV.HE shows 6.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Other expenses change of 1.57% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.57%
Operating expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.01%
Total costs growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
49.37%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 19.15%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
3.78%
D&A growth 50-75% of STERV.HE's 7.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-48.68%
EBITDA decline while STERV.HE shows 44.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.07%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 54.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.22%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 113.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.15%
Operating margin decline while STERV.HE shows 126.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.53%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.75%
Pre-tax income decline while STERV.HE shows 277.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while STERV.HE shows 301.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.05%
Tax expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-59.09%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 331.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.05%
Net margin decline while STERV.HE shows 358.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.67%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 450.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.67%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 450.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.73%
Share count change of 22.73% while STERV.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
22.73%
Diluted share change of 22.73% while STERV.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.