PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.540.04 (-0.72%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while STERV.HE shows 1.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.76%
Cost growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 8.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-56.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.09%
Operating expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 11.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.75%
Total costs growth 50-75% of STERV.HE's 9.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-22.22%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
86.47%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.05%
EBITDA growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-80.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.25%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-93.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.91%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-70.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.81%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.89%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.