PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.67%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.89%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.16%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.54%
Margin expansion below 50% of STERV.HE's 2.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Other expenses change of 5.05% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.69%
Interest expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 40.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.06%
EBITDA decline while STERV.HE shows 4.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.05%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 6.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Operating margin decline while STERV.HE shows 13.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.83%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
527.27%
Tax expense growth while STERV.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-51.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.14%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.14%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.