5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.04%
Positive growth while STERV.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.63%
Cost increase while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-8.38%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.22%
Total costs growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.08%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
35.46%
D&A growth 50-75% of STERV.HE's 58.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
3.81%
EBITDA growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 4.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.44%
Other expenses growth less than half of STERV.HE's 64.65%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-22.35%
Pre-tax income decline while STERV.HE shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while STERV.HE shows 14.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.83%
Tax expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 35.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.83%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.94%
Net margin decline while STERV.HE shows 8.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.79%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.79%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.