5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.21%
Revenue decline while STERV.HE shows 0.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.46%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 47.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.51%
Margin expansion below 50% of STERV.HE's 46.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.25%
Other expenses change of 20.25% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
20.25%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x STERV.HE's 16.71%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
1.48%
Total costs growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.02%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.09%
EBITDA growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 148.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.44%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 156.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-52.94%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 300.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.88%
Operating margin decline while STERV.HE shows 299.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of STERV.HE's 38.18%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-56.19%
Pre-tax income decline while STERV.HE shows 462.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while STERV.HE shows 460.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.30%
Tax expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 122.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.15%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 642.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.03%
Net margin decline while STERV.HE shows 640.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 633.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 633.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.86%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.