PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.21%
Positive growth while STERV.HE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.46%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
15.43%
Positive growth while STERV.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.18%
Margin expansion while STERV.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.53%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.53%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x STERV.HE's 17.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
45.60%
EBITDA margin growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.75%
Operating income growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.33%
Operating margin growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.94%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 32.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
121.11%
Pre-tax income growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.60%
Tax expense growth while STERV.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
133.94%
Net income growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.44%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x STERV.HE's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
150.00%
EPS growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.43%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.43%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.