PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.08%
Cost growth less than half of STERV.HE's 7.84%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.36%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.74%
Total costs growth less than half of STERV.HE's 2.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.94%
D&A reduction while STERV.HE shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.23%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.26%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.90%
Share count change of 4.90% while STERV.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
4.90%
Diluted share increase while STERV.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.