PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.77%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 9.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
13.78%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x STERV.HE's 12.34%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
7.65%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.28%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.28%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 7.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.72%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 10.64%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-75.00%
Interest expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.42%
D&A growth while STERV.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.79%
EBITDA growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.91%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 1.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.16%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.65%
Pre-tax income growth while STERV.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.02%
Tax expense growth while STERV.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.88%
Net income decline while STERV.HE shows 4.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.23%
EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 2.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.23%
Diluted EPS decline while STERV.HE shows 2.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.24%
Share count reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while STERV.HE shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.