PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.52%
Cost increase while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.01%
Gross profit decline while STERV.HE shows 6.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.55%
Margin decline while STERV.HE shows 9.74% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Other expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 553.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.75%
Total costs growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Interest expense change of 100.00% while STERV.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
9.77%
D&A growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 1.52%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 24.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while STERV.HE shows 28.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.66%
Operating income decline while STERV.HE shows 28.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.23%
Operating margin decline while STERV.HE shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.29%
Other expenses growth while STERV.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 21.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.40%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 24.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.42%
Tax expense reduction while STERV.HE shows 14.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.43%
Net income growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 22.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.98%
Net margin growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 26.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 23.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of STERV.HE's 23.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Share count change of 0.24% while STERV.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share increase while STERV.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.