5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.31%
Revenue decline while STERV.HE shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.44%
Cost reduction while STERV.HE shows 7.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Operating expenses reduction while STERV.HE shows 8.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.58%
Total costs reduction while STERV.HE shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
34.48%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 12.82%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-39.50%
D&A reduction while STERV.HE shows 11.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-57.98%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-471.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-496.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-260.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-276.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.50%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-210.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-223.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.33%
Share count increase while STERV.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of STERV.HE's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.