5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.07%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 5.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 16.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.02%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.02%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 2.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.54%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
55.74%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 4.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
59.03%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 36.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
92.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 29.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.50%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 75.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
575.00%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 5.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
585.05%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.87%
Share count change of 21.87% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
21.87%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.