PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.67%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 7.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.86%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 43.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-78.90%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 43.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.10%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 24.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.75%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 46.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-50.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
59.38%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.47%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.81%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.28%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.37%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-33.33%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.07%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.07%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.29%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.29%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.56%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 1.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-13.56%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.64% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.