PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.22%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 1.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.26%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 3.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.30%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.94%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.18%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-116.18%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.24%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 3.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-81.88%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.45%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 14.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
575.00%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
689.31%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4125.00%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4302.35%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.07%
Other expenses growth less than half of UPM.HE's 907.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
983.33%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1022.25%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
733.33%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1033.33%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1074.46%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
972.21%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 69.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
972.21%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 69.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.56%
Share count change of 7.56% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
7.56%
Diluted share increase while UPM.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.