5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.15%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.19%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 1.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.10%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 3.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.57%
Operating expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.01%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
49.37%
Interest expense growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.78%
D&A growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-48.68%
EBITDA decline while UPM.HE shows 13.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.07%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 15.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.22%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 28.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.15%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 30.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.53%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-57.75%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 29.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 32.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.05%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-59.09%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 21.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.05%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 23.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.67%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.67%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 18.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.73%
Share count reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
22.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of UPM.HE's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.