PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.70%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.18%
Cost reduction while UPM.HE shows 3.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.46%
Positive growth while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.17%
Margin expansion while UPM.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.48%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.27%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 2.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.28%
Interest expense growth less than half of UPM.HE's 40.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.38%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.56%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 4.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
42.22%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.92%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
57.02%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.60%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
80.12%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
81.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.79%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.69%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
88.01%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
66.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.01%
Share count change of 12.01% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
12.01%
Diluted share change of 12.01% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.