PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.92%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.52%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 2.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.87%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x UPM.HE's 2.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 22.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.19%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 22.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.64%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.23%
Interest expense change of 9.23% while UPM.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
9.61%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.54%
EBITDA growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.09%
EBITDA margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.50%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.67%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-80.00%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.03%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 44.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.29%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.29%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.25%
Share count change of 13.25% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
13.25%
Diluted share change of 13.25% while UPM.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.