5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.04%
Growth of 4.04% while UPM.HE shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
9.63%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-8.38%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 5.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.94%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 5.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.22%
Total costs growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.08%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
35.46%
D&A growth while UPM.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.81%
EBITDA growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 15.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.22%
EBITDA margin decline while UPM.HE shows 15.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.90%
Operating income decline while UPM.HE shows 38.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.89%
Operating margin decline while UPM.HE shows 38.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.44%
Other expenses growth while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.35%
Pre-tax income decline while UPM.HE shows 34.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while UPM.HE shows 34.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.83%
Tax expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 30.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.83%
Net income decline while UPM.HE shows 36.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.94%
Net margin decline while UPM.HE shows 36.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 35.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Diluted EPS decline while UPM.HE shows 35.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.79%
Share count reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.79%
Diluted share reduction while UPM.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.