PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.14%
Revenue decline while UPM.HE shows 1.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
13.54%
Cost increase while UPM.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-51.16%
Gross profit decline while UPM.HE shows 485.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-49.06%
Margin decline while UPM.HE shows 477.68% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.21%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3918.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-63.21%
Operating expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 3918.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.46%
Total costs reduction while UPM.HE shows 12.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.31%
Interest expense reduction while UPM.HE shows 1850.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-40.00%
D&A reduction while UPM.HE shows 22.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-24.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
44.74%
Operating income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.98%
Operating margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.59%
Other expenses reduction while UPM.HE shows 92.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.44%
Pre-tax income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.33%
Tax expense growth while UPM.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.80%
Net income growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.53%
Net margin growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.80%
EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.80%
Diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.